Penny Wise, Pound Foolish
Published Newsday August 6, 2001
RICHARD JOSEPH
GENERAL MANAGER,
CARIBBEAN BUSINESS SERVICES LIMITED
One of the best attended breakfast seminars hosted by the Trinidad and
Tobago Chamber of Industry and Commerce has been on “Fundamentals of a
successful Maintenance Operation”. Though it was essentially a promotional
venture by a firm of consultants, the rapt attention paid by the audience
spoke of a need that many in our business community feel. What was also
unusual is that the Government Minister who opened the proceeding remained
and was an interested member of the audience.
Until quite recently, equipment maintenance was an issue that was not
given much importance by companies whether in manufacturing, construction
or building management. The philosophy of “don’t fix it if it isn’t
broken” was taken to an extreme, and maintenance was a completely reactive
activity, i.e. it was only carried out when equipment became inoperable.
The attitude that gave rise to this can be described as “penny wise and
pound foolish”. Establishing a proper maintenance program requires an
investment in skilled personnel, proper procedures, and an adequate supply
of spare parts. All of this has incorrectly been seen as overhead
expenditure without a direct impact on sales, but a direct impact on
profitability. Essentially, owners bet that in the short term, if
equipment did not breakdown, they would have saved the maintenance costs.
In reality, however, equipment that has not been properly maintained
does break down eventually, frequently with costs that are much more
extensive than the bare maintenance expenses.
Of course, equipment perversely chooses to break down when it is needed
the most. Often, in these situations the part that is required is not in
the inventory of either the owner, or the service representative in the
country, therefore lengthening the time required to become operational
again. Quantifiable effects of breakdowns due to inadequate maintenance
are high operation costs, sub-optimum levels of productivity and not
infrequently, loss of the particular piece of equipment. The less visible
effects are waste of valuable management time, and loss of reputation due
to unfulfilled or delayed fulfillment of contracts.
On a national level, the impact is lack of international
competitiveness and waste of foreign exchange due to avoidable
expenditure. There are four simple steps to an effective maintenance
regime:
1. Prepare a list of all assets showing the date purchased and the
model and serial number where appropriate.
2. Acquire manufacturers maintenance manuals for all equipment
including subscriptions to any updating service offered.
3. Prepare maintenance schedules in accordance with manufacturers
recommendations and production / operation requirements.
4. Implement a monitoring and reporting system which should be used to
ensure that preventative maintenance is carried out properly.
According to management consultants, one of the easiest and quickest
ways to impact on the clients’ profitability is to ensure that
preventative maintenance systems are implemented.
Everyone agrees that it should be done, but resources are more readily
directed in areas which have a much lesser impact in relation to money.
Even as technology has been successfully transferred to countries with
low labour rates, enterprises in developed countries have been able to
mention their competitiveness through efficiency and quality arising from
superior management practices, including maintenance systems which improve
machine reliability and product quality.
As our competitiveness becomes threatened by lower cost producers, we
must ensure that Trinidad and Tobago’s management systems, including
maintenance, are at the cutting edge: otherwise we will fall at the
wayside. |